[Serra Britt]

Good point Espy XD

And tsukiko is right, you *could* wear clothes...

[Espy]

Might be hard; nothing lines up quite right, avatar-wise :P

[Serra Britt]

You...might be able to get a bracelet in the right spot? XD

[tsukiko]

awww that's true, espy :(

[Espy]

Yeah, bracelets and handhelds kind of work. Though handhelds are usually just a pixel off on either side of the paw.

[tsukiko]

kitsune are magical...they can make things float :P

[SparX]

I am now back from the wedding. Everyone is so beautiful in their birthday suits =D

[tsukiko]

nooooooooooooo.....i'm running around in my UNBIRTHDAY suit....cause it's not my birthday xD

how was the wedding?

[mdom]

Does my avatar count, since it's baseless? xDD
Or do I need something that *could* be dressed but it's not to be actually naked?

[SparX]

I CRIED SO MANY TIMES
They have been together for 7 1/2 years, and have a 1 yr old daughter and a another on the way (they found out after he proposed) so we have been WAITING for this to happen. They are so perfect together and she was so beautiful T.T

Edit: I would say no. Not on being baseless. An easily identifiable individual character/creature or avatar would be acceptable, if that makes sense?

Examples - Galla has the charlie crying accessory in front of a naked skeleton. Skeleton is naked. Skeleton is "galla". Or Espy is a singular fox (that I also believe with some accessory we have could somewhat dress it)
Sorry for delay, I had to figure out my wording in a way I hope is not confusing XD I had to retype it 5 times xD

[tsukiko]

awwwwwweeeee that's so sweet! you're making me tear up just reading that

[Quiet Man Cometh]

Well, seeing as the avatar I'm making my latest DnD character is still naked, you can all admire him until I find him some suitable wear.

[mdom]

There, all tattoos and hair xD
is this naked enough?

[SparX]

that is definitely naked XD

[tsukiko]

bwahahahahaaa! you look so different, mdom!

[mdom]

Rainbow nudeness woohoo!!!