[Duce]

Aah, but you see, I said some people; thus rendering my statement perfectly allowable within common circumstance, as it only applies to those select groups. As such, this may encompass a great many people, but the properties therein also only inherently need be put to those who do not feel the need to read a text at length. So it is still a perfectly true statement within it's intended focus.

I was also not blaming anyone within my statement of course, everyone is entitled to their own comfort in literacy, every being having their own personal likes and dislikes, levels of commitment or intrigue and so on. As well as writers having their own unique levels of interest based on perception and content. Should I have said that some people prefer not to give to charity, this does not mean that people are likely to not give to charity, nor does it condemn those who do not. It also does not necessarily imply a charity deserves donations. It is merely a statement. Some hues are tulls, and some tulls are mulls. But this does not necessarily mean all mulls are hues.

I feel somewhere along the line, my statement was taken much more seriously than it's intended use; and that is acceptable also as everyone will undoubtedly interpret anything in any fashion they so desire based on personal preference and life outlook. As you had previously done with my first approach to the topic.

*Gears up for a very manly roar of triumph then just slumps down in a chair with a yawn, dragging someone's coat over to cover himself.* Mmmm too tired for roaring..