Ducky
A*DIC*TED
|
|
|
#25
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader
Exactly my point... why pay $60 to buy a game that is EXACTLY the same as its predecessor? At least the Battlefield franchise expands and adds tons of new features with each game. Call of Duty is just, "Hey, let's change the perk system a little, add some new maps, and change some of the visuals, then sell it for $60 because people will buy it regardless simply because of it has 'Call of Duty' in it."
It just seems like an utter and complete waste of money to me.
|
Well i can justify it by saying i have never actually bought a COD game before, so i'm fine with the $60 for it.
But considering the amount of new maps in it, if they were all just DLC for the first one it would probably cost about $60 :P
|
|
Posted 11-20-2012, 07:45 AM
|
|
|