Trisphee

Trisphee (http://www.trisphee.com/forums/index.php)
-   Central Square (http://www.trisphee.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Jibber-jabber? (http://www.trisphee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=517)

The Great Eagle Eye 12-04-2010 12:21 AM

Of course, that is not to say we aren't having a chat...

Allow me to rephrase:

There is no continuous conversation in this thread. Interruptions and random interjections prevent it.

Echo-chan713 12-04-2010 12:22 AM

I can tell

NikkoGallarado 12-04-2010 12:23 AM

It's okay moon no will really get any of this unless you all live in the same house as us.

This is what happens when you don't fucking read what is going on.

Axion 12-04-2010 12:23 AM

However, I can make the argument to say that without the continuous flow of headway in a particular direction, there can be no conversation. Therefore, this is simply banter!!

Keinedon Avorellis 12-04-2010 12:24 AM

Conversations may be held. But are rarely obtainable

The Great Eagle Eye 12-04-2010 12:25 AM

We are currently having a conversation about whether or not conversations can exist here.

Keinedon Avorellis 12-04-2010 12:26 AM

I like pie!

Conversations are easily broken

Axion 12-04-2010 12:27 AM

Tch, fine I concede to that red truth... Axion stands defeated at this juncture. However, refute this.. This is not a true conversation but a filibuster!!

NikkoGallarado 12-04-2010 12:27 AM

I do like pie also.

It can happen from time to time.

The Great Eagle Eye 12-04-2010 12:28 AM

Once more, my previous truth stands.

There is no continuous conversation in this thread. Interruptions and random interjections prevent it.

Keinedon Avorellis 12-04-2010 12:30 AM

A filibuster is described as an incredibly long speech.

So this truth must be stated in red...

There are too many individuals involved for a filibuster to be present.

Axion 12-04-2010 12:32 AM

ahaha ahaha ahaha ahaha ahaha ahaha!!!!!! Problem jibber-jabberrrrrrr?

The Great Eagle Eye 12-04-2010 12:32 AM

A filibuster can be preformed by multiple people, the republican part of the house has done chain filibusters in the past using multiple members.

This could be a filibuster.

However, a filibuster prevents a room from reaching a conclusion on a subject or matter. We are trying to reach a conclusion about conversations.

This is a filibuster.

NikkoGallarado 12-04-2010 12:34 AM

I must say that, I feel like I would like come ice cream.

But one can hold conversation if one chooses to.

Keinedon Avorellis 12-04-2010 12:37 AM

We have not engaged in tactics to obstruct a decision from being formed.

This is the purpose of a filibuster.

We have not stated what decision we are trying to reach.

A filibuster is not possible

NikkoGallarado 12-04-2010 12:38 AM

Thus why I enjoy watching all this happen.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®