|
I've got the Sarya's bundle achievement, so here's what I've got in my inventory with Sarya in it on an av.
I went ahead and did it in purple, if you want to see the other colors, let me know. [I was in the process of fixing my av, and saving it to pb, so I didn't see that someone had already posted XD] |
Quote:
Quote:
So I just need to get the top. Looks like a comfortable and nerdly outfit. |
*Looks around library*
...quiet as the grave...I like it...MUAHAHAHAHA |
*comes tip toeing in*
*NOISE* :D |
So, how are you, Tam?
|
Fervently grateful for the cool, rainyish weather today, even though it hasn't cleared up the smoke. You?
|
Tired and about to fall asleep...
3...2...1...ZZZZzzzzzz..... (Is not feeling good for no reason I know of, so hoping to sleep it off) Also, I am adding a climate/geological site to the library...umm, considering the possibility of the FCC allowing for anti-net neutrality (in other words, allowing internet to be treated like cable - sanctioned off into bundles and the like)...I may be trying to save as many of these resources as possible... |
...Into bundles. What???
|
Ah, yeah. that stupid thing with the FCC. If they have their way, the rest of us get screwed over.
Also, Lawtan... Ever hear of a paradox smoothie? :3 |
From my Facebook post on it:
...as an additional note, it was the Courts who said the FCC could make the rules in the first place... FCC on the situation Hyperbole of a world without open internet (without "net neutrality") EFF Foundation on it Forbes on the Issue |
0_0 This is the first time I've heard of any of this.
|
We've been fighting crap like this for at least the past year to year and a half, really.
|
*Hugs the Autobot* Save us, Den! XD
I know. I think that was what I was trying to talk about earlier, but as I couldn't find sources, it wound up in confusion. ...In truth, the more I understand it, the more it seems like something people are trying to navigate so it doesn't crash, but without a way to actually do so. They are trying to reword it to get the same result as the one the court rejected (That was beneficial to "net neutrality"), but with "nicer words." There is a push for it being governmentalized, and there is a push to let it be like cable TV, and both groups are avoiding the actual document itself. (Typical socio-political shenanigans) |
So WHAT exactly are they trying to do? What do you mean, "Like cable"? Not having TV, and never having had cable in my life, I might be missing the obvious in what you're saying.
|
The cable companies (AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, etc...control phone, cable TV, and internet broadband) are able to only offer certain television channels to their clients - the channels have to pay them for the benefit of being able to show to viewers in certain areas. Also, like health insurance, most cable companies have monopoly-like control over areas, they can fine-tune and control what people view.
With the current/possibly past internet, the policy avoiding such things has led to a less controlled/financially viable market for them. The argument is thus: for them to continue to improve internet connection, among other things, they would like something closer to what they have with cable. |
Ugh! *flops into library exhausted*
The last 24 hours have been... well... let's just say they've been. DX |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®